From an outside perspective, it would seem that Canada and America are very similar countries.
And they are. We have most of the same foods and entertainment. Our sports
teams compete in the same leagues. We share the longest undefended border in
the world.
But once you scratch the surface, there exists a large gulf
between us in terms of culture, national identity, and world perception. So why is that? We were both
colonized by the British and the French. We have both participated in two World
Wars. We’ve gained access to advances in technology in roughly the same time
frame. So what’s the difference?
Having lived in the Great White North for nearly two months,
I’ve decided this makes me an expert. Not really, I know jack shit. So prepare
yourself for some pretty rampant generalizations. And for those of you who know
more than me (i.e. everyone) please feel free to tell me what I'm missing. Bitches gotta
learn!
In my opinion, the whole thing begins with the British. More
specifically, the ways in which the two countries gained their sovereignty from the British Empire. Almost
any grade school child in all of North America
can more or less recite the story of the American Revolution. Rebels poured tea in a harbor. Paul Revere rode
a horse. George Washington crossed a river. The
French showed up to save our asses. Mel Gibson was in there somewhere. And a
nation was born.
But how many Americans know how Canada gained their independence?
Quick summary: in 1867, Great Britain unified the Canadian
colonies into one commonwealth so that they would be protected from the threat
of the Yankees down south. Then, in 1960, Canada drafted its first Bill of
Rights., followed by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms (their version of the
constitution) in 1982. So only in 1982 did Canada finally sever its final ties
to the British Parliament. And they are still a commonwealth of Britain .
The queen is on their money and everything.
Full disclosure: I had to Google all of that.
See anything missing? No Declaration of Independence . None of the “don’t tread on me”
rhetoric that still remains a staple of the American psyche. And while there
certainly were Canadian revolts and riots in opposition to British rule, from
what I’ve researched they were few and far between.
And that makes a big difference. Americans seem to have this
ingrained idea that we had to fight for our freedom, therefore we must always
be vigilant in case someone comes along and tries to take that freedom away. And the fear rhetoric
that is a staple of our media networks all seems to stem from this basic tenant.
Lookin’ at you Lumpy.
That sense of defensiveness just doesn’t seem to be as big a
part of the national mindset in Canada .
Yes, they’re aware of the fact that there are threats in the world. Yes, they
intend to retaliate with force should anyone threaten their country. But it
doesn’t really take up a large part of their day.
And while I fully realize I’m drawing conclusions like a
toddler draws on a wall, it makes sense to me. Because a country
being birthed by war versus a series of peaceful resolutions would certainly make
a difference on the wider outlook of the citizens of that country.
Wouldn’t it?
I’m going to continue to ponder this idea. I’ll keep you
posted.
1982? I didn't know that. I thought their independence happened in the 1950s for some reason, when Britain began the process of world-wide-colonization. Yet maybe that has something to do with the Bill of Rights in 1960. Intriguing...
ReplyDeleteInteresting that you use a Thai expression: Same Same - But different - ก็ เหมือน เหมือน กัน, เเต่ เเตกต่างกัน น่ :)
ReplyDelete